Application of The Kirkpatrick Level 3 Model to Evaluate The Human Resource Training Program at PT X

Authors

  • Allamah Alalusy Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
  • Idha Rahayuningsih Universitas Muhamadiyah Gresik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62255/noval.v2i2.131

Abstract


Learning is a process that takes place to gain knowledge and knowledge. Learning activities carried out
in the corporate or work world are better known as training and development activities. With training
activities, it is hoped that there will be an increase in employee knowledge, skills and attitudes, so that
company goals can be achieved. Training evaluation is a stage that should be an integral part of the
training program. PT X is one of the companies that has also managed Learning & Capability
Development, the implementation of which continues to be in the process of development and
improvement. The process of Training Needs Analysis, implementation and evaluation has been carried
out and carried out in 3 stages, however the evaluation of stage 3 cannot yet be carried out because there
is still the problem of not having tools implemented in the Company to carry out level 3 evaluations.
The evaluation model used is known as Donald L. Kirkpatrick.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords:

Training, Evaluation, Learning & Capability, Krikpatrick

Author Biographies

Allamah Alalusy, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

 

 

 

Idha Rahayuningsih, Universitas Muhamadiyah Gresik

 

 

References

Anggoro Prasetyo Utomo dan Karinka Priskila Tehupeiory. (2014). Evaluasi Pelatihan dengan Metode

Kirkpatrick Analysis. Jurnal Telematika, 9(2), hlm. 38. Bangun, W. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Erlangga. Chris Rowley. (2012). Manajemen

Sumber Daya Manusia.

Rajawali pers. Dessler, G. (2004). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Edisi 9. J).

Kelompok Gramedia. Hamalik, O. (2000). Manajemen Pendidikan dan Pelatihan. Y.P Permindo.

Hamalik, O. (2001). Proses Belajar mengajar. PT Bumi Aksara.

Han, H. & Boulay, D. (2013). Reflections and Future Prospect for Evaluation Human Resource

Development, Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management.

Handoko, T. H. (2010). Manajemen Personalia & Sumber daya Manusia. BPFE.

Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. (Edisi Revi). PT. Bumi Aksara.

Jusmaliani. (2011). Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Insani. Sinar Grafika Offset.

Martoyo, S. (1992). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Edisi ke 2). BPFE UG.

Marwansyah. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Edisi Kedua (ed.)). Alfabeta.

Mathis Robert, J. J. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Salemba empat. Nawawi,

H. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Untuk Bisnis Yang Kompetitif).

Nurhayati, Y. (2018). Penerapan Model Kirkpatrick untuk Evaluasi Program 60 Diklat Teknis Subtantif

Materi Perencanaan Pembelajaran Di Wilayah Kerja Provinsi Kepulauan Riau. Andragogi:

Jurnal

Diklat

Teknis

Pendidikan

Dan

Keagamaan,

(2),

–187.

https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v6i2.63 Ragawanti, E. (2014). Pengaruh On The Job

Training Dan Off The Job Training Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. 8(2), 1–9.

Rahman, R. W., & Nurbiyati, T. (2015). Evaluasi Pelatihan Dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia

Pada Disiplin Kerja Dan Kinerja Karyawan. Jbti, 6(2), 120–141.

Rivai., V. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan. In Edisi ke 6,. PT. Raja

Grafindo Persada.

Robert, G. (1989). Kondisi Belajar dan Teori Pembelajaran. (terjemah Munandir). PAUDirjen Dikti

Depdikbud.

Santoso,B. (2013). Skema dan Mekanisme Pelatihan : Panduan Penyelenggaraan Pelatihan. Jakarta :

yayasan terumbu Karang Indonesia (TERANGI).

Downloads

Published

2024-12-19

How to Cite

Alalusy, A., & Rahayuningsih, I. . (2024). Application of The Kirkpatrick Level 3 Model to Evaluate The Human Resource Training Program at PT X. Inovasi Lokal, 2(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.62255/noval.v2i2.131